SCO vs. IBM					 Tech Insider's Review

Path: controlnews3.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!
sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Al Petrofsky < a...@petrofsky.org>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc
Subject: SCO vs. DaimlerChrysler trial scheduled for January 11, 2005
Date: 25 May 2004 23:01:05 -0700
Organization: The Vegetable Liberation Front
Message-ID: < 87oeobu3q6.fsf@radish.petrofsky.org>
Sender: a...@radish.petrofsky.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cache-Post-Path: smirk!unk...@radish.petrofsky.org
X-Cache: nntpcache 2.3.3 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/)
X-Complaints-To: ab...@supernews.com
Lines: 76
Xref: controlnews3.google.com comp.unix.sco.misc:550

Over the weekend, the Oakland County (Michigan) computer assigned a
trial date of January 11, 2005 to the SCO vs. DaimlerChrysler case.

Don't book your plane reservations just yet, though: there's still the
matter of Daimler's motion for the court to rule summarily in
Daimler's favor now.  A hearing on that is scheduled for June 9.  

Below is the docket listing the court provided to me.  It appears to
be a printout from some kind of 3270 terminal application.  Whatever
method they use to print unfortunately crops off the last column.

You can see the May 4 order (which set the June 9 hearing date) at
sco.petrofsky.org.  I am told that for the May 22 "SCHEDULING ORDER
WRITTEN" entry, no corresponding written and signed judge's order
actually exists.  The "SO" in the leftmost columns indicates that this
instead was some automatic scheduling initiated by the computer.

-al


P.S.  This is my first post to comp.unix.sco.misc, and I'll gladly
accept suggestions for a better newsgroup to have used.  I think
alt.suit.att-bsdi would be good, but it no longer has much
propagation, and it seems nobody has created
alt.suit.sco-rest-of-the-world yet.


 JCC040-2        OAKLAND COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE - F. WILLIAM CADDELL      05/24/0
 PAGE NO: 001 OF 002     DOCKET DISPLAY - IMAGE RETRIEVAL               08:36:0
 NEXT PAGE: 002                                                  ACT: 03/03/200
                                                                DISP:
 CASE NO: 2004 056587 CK      SCO GROUP INC            ATTY: SERLIN,JOEL H
                              VS
 JUDGE: RAE LEE CHABOT        DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP           TUPPER,STEPHEN L

 _    03/03/2004 COMPLAINT FILED /JURY DEMAND                                C
 _    03/03/2004 SUMMONS ISSUED                                              SI
 _    03/04/2004 P/S ON SUMMONS FILED                                        SU
 _    03/15/2004 MOTION FILED ADMISS PRO HAC VICE/PLF                        MT
 _    03/26/2004 APPEARANCE FILED DAIMLERCHRSLER                             AP
 _    04/15/2004 MOTION FILED SUM DISP/DAIMLERCHRYSLER                       MT
 _    04/15/2004 NOTICE OF HEARING FILED                                     NO
 _    04/15/2004 ANSWER TO COMPLAINT FILED /AFM/DAIMLERCHYRSLER              AT
 _    04/15/2004 MEMORANDUM FILED SUPPT MTN SUM DISP/DAIMLERCHRYSLER         ME
 _    05/04/2004 SCHEDULING ORDER FILED SUM DISP                             SO
   SO 05/22/2004 SCHEDULING ORDER WRITTEN                                    SO
   SO 05/22/2004 08/27/2004 EXPERT DATE.

 ENTER KEY FOR NEXT PAGE, OR ENTER REQUESTED PAGE NO.
 ATTYS(Y):     FEES(Y):
 ALL RECORDS HAVE BEEN DISPLAYED FOR THIS CASE

 JCC040-2        OAKLAND COUNTY CLERKS OFFICE - F. WILLIAM CADDELL      05/24/0
 PAGE NO: 002 OF 002     DOCKET DISPLAY - IMAGE RETRIEVAL               08:36:1
 NEXT PAGE: 01                                                   ACT: 03/03/200
                                                                DISP:
 CASE NO: 2004 056587 CK      SCO GROUP INC            ATTY: SERLIN,JOEL H
                              VS
 JUDGE: RAE LEE CHABOT        DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORP           TUPPER,STEPHEN L

   SO 05/22/2004 10/27/2004 CASE EVALUATION DATE.
   SO 05/22/2004 08/27/2004 WITNESS DATE.
   SO 05/22/2004 11/26/2004 MOTION DATE.
   SO 05/22/2004 09/27/2004 DISCOVERY DATE.
   SO 05/22/2004 01/11/2005 TRIAL DATE.
   SO 05/22/2004 DATE ASSIGNED FOR APPEARANCE FOR 050111 T  08 30 AM         AP 
                 LAST OF CASE DATA






 ENTER KEY FOR NEXT PAGE, OR ENTER REQUESTED PAGE NO.
 ATTYS(Y):     FEES(Y):
 ALL RECORDS HAVE BEEN DISPLAYED FOR THIS CASE

The materials and information included in this review are not to be used 
for any other purpose other than private study, research or criticism.


Electronic mail:			       WorldWideWeb:
   tech-insider@outlook.com			  http://sco-vs-ibm.org/